Difference between revisions of "Integration Levels"
From SmartHubs
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | Here you can find a short overview on the integration levels developed by the SmartHubs team, called the SmartHubs Ladder. All hubs in the platform are evaluated following this definitions. For more details on the levels and the background see '''[https://www.smartmobilityhubs.eu/_files/ugd/c54b12_a5b12866aa79459298b0114b1e766575.pdf this description of the mulitdimensional hub typology]'''. | ||
+ | |||
+ | === SmartHubs Ladder === | ||
+ | |||
<table class="table table-bordered table-sm integration-levels" style="text-align:center"> | <table class="table table-bordered table-sm integration-levels" style="text-align:center"> | ||
<tr> | <tr> |
Revision as of 14:51, 17 May 2022
Here you can find a short overview on the integration levels developed by the SmartHubs team, called the SmartHubs Ladder. All hubs in the platform are evaluated following this definitions. For more details on the levels and the background see this description of the mulitdimensional hub typology.
SmartHubs Ladder
Physical Integration | Digital Integration | Democratic Integration | ||
Smart Mobility Hub | 4 | Conflict free and place making | Integration of societal goals, policies and incentives | Social learning |
3 | Visibility and branding | Integration of service offers | Integration of different knowledge | |
2 | Wayfinding and universal design | Integration of booking and payment and universal design | Deliberative engagement of stakeholders | |
Mobility hub | 1 | Acceptable walking distance to shared and public transport | Integration of information | Appropriate representation of stakeholder interests |
Single mobility services | 0 | No physical integration | No digital integration | No involvement |
Detailed Information about Integration Levels
Physical Integration | Digital Integration | Democratic Integration | |
Level 4 | Conflict free and place making At least two shared transport modes visible from a public transport stop with no conflicts and information of using the services and at least two services. Universal design principles are considered | Integration of societal goals, policies and incentives Local, regional, and/or national policies and goals are integrated into the service or all modes are bundled, possibly subscription-based. | Social learning Participation takers and givers, including vulnerable users, have networked and integrated into the community, participation becomes permanent and independent |
Level 3 | Visibility and branding At least two shared transport modes visible from a public transport stop and at least two services (e.g., shop, parcel locker, kiosk), information about the service and potential conflicts, attractive design of the mobility hub including placemaking, branding and aesthetically pleasing scheme. Universal design principles are considered. | Integration of service offers All shared and public transport services at the hub can be found, booked, and paid with the same app. Universal design principles are considered, including simple and intuitive app design and analogue, on-site booking alternatives are available for all modes. | Integration of different knowledge Participation takers, including vulnerable users, argue or deny positions, their input is integrated into the participation process, participation givers create a room for decision making |
Level 2 | Wayfinding and universal design At least two shared transport modes in acceptable walking distance to public transport with wayfinding and information of using the service and at least two services (e.g., parcel locker, kiosk) in acceptable walking distance. Universal design principles are considered. | Integration of booking and payment and universal design Easy access to services for end users – such as a mobility marketplace or a one-stop shop where the user can find, book, and pay with the same app for at least public transport services and one shared mode at the hub. Universal design principles are considered, including simple and intuitive app design and minimum support for non-digital users. | Deliberative engagement of stakeholders Participation takers, directly including vulnerable users, argue or deny positions, their input is integrated into the participation process, participation givers create a room for decision making. |
Level 1 | Acceptable walking distance to shared and public transport At least two shared transport modes in acceptable walking distance to public transport and at least one service (e.g., shop, parcel locker, kiosk) in acceptable walking distance. Minimum legal inclusive design requirements are considered | Integration of information Multimodal travel planners can be used to plan at least the public transport services and one shared mode at the hub. Minimum inclusive design requirements are considered such as simple and intuitive app design. | Appropriate representation of stakeholder interests Participation takers got asked into a consultation process, Information are recognized. No or limited attention to involve vulnerable user groups. |
Level 0 | No physical integration One shared transport mode, not at walking distance to public transport, no integration between the modes. No universal design criteria are considered | No digital integration No digital integration of shared and public transport mode options offered at the hub. There are separate services and platforms for each mode. No universal design criteria are required | No involvement No involvement or consideration of stakeholder interests and user needs. |