From SmartHubs
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|pt-services=1, 2 | |pt-services=1, 2 | ||
|s-carsharing=2 | |s-carsharing=2 | ||
| + | |mobility-related-services=2 | ||
|other-services=1, 3 | |other-services=1, 3 | ||
|info-logo=No | |info-logo=No | ||
| Line 19: | Line 20: | ||
|info-assistance=No | |info-assistance=No | ||
|info-placemaking=No | |info-placemaking=No | ||
| − | |inclusion-minimum= | + | |inclusion-minimum=Yes |
|inclusion-universal=No | |inclusion-universal=No | ||
|planner-intuitive=No | |planner-intuitive=No | ||
Latest revision as of 13:26, 7 April 2023
Status
ongoing
Short Description
Operation Start (Year)
2023
Location
Hamburg, Germany
Physical Integration
Level 0
Definition 0 (No physical integration): One shared transport mode, not at walking distance to public transport, no integration between the modes. No universal design criteria are considered
Digital Integration
Level 0
Definition 0 (No digital integration): No digital integration of shared and public transport mode options offered at the hub. There are separate services and platforms for each mode. No universal design criteria are required
Democratic Integration
Level 2
Definition 2 (Deliberative engagement of stakeholders): Participation takers, directly including vulnerable users, argue or deny positions, their input is integrated into the participation process, participation givers create a room for decision making.
Initiation of the hub
government initiated
Services
2 PT services:
bus
train
1 shared service:
Carsharing
1 mobility-related service:
Parking for private cars
2 other services:
Parcel station
Social Services (e.g. Community Center, Library …)
Inclusive Design
Minimum legal inclusive design requirements are/were considered in the design of the hub.
Participation
Information in a workshop/public hearing was provided, no input was collected.
Information on a proposal was provided and feedback was asked in a workshop or survey.
Participants were able to propose solutions to a specific problem in a workshop/similar event.
Participants collectively identified issue(s) and proposed solutions
There is an ongoing cooperation to identify issue(s) and develop solutions
The participants who provided input received feedback on how their input was used
The needs of vulnerable users were included in the participation process (surveys, interviews of intermediary institutions, ...)