Difference between revisions of "Template:Physical-integration-levels"

From SmartHubs
Jump to: navigation, search
(Undo revision 3300 by Admin (talk))
Tag: Undo
Line 1: Line 1:
* '''Level 4''': Visibility + no conflicts + Wayfinding + Information<br>> 2 shared transport modes visible from a public transport stop with no conflicts and information of using the service plus <br>> 2 services
+
* '''Level 4''': '''Conflict free and place making''' – At least two shared transport modes visible from a public transport stop with no conflicts and information of using the services and at least two services. Universal design principles are considered.
* '''Level 3''': Visibility + Wayfinding + Information<br>> 2 shared transport modes visible from a public transport stop and <br>> 1 service plus information of using the service and potential conflicts (e.g., barriers between the modes that require to cross the road or walk extensively to use different modes)
+
* '''Level 3''': '''Visibility and branding''' – At least two shared transport modes visible from a public transport stop and at least one service (e.g., shop, parcel locker, kiosk), information about the service and potential conflicts, attractive design of the mobility hub, branding and aesthetically pleasing scheme. Universal design principles are considered.
* '''Level 2''': Acceptable walking distance + Wayfinding + Information<br>> 2 shared transport modes in acceptable walking distance to public transport with wayfinding (i.e., pavement markings) and information of using the service and <br>>1 service in acceptable walking distance  
+
* '''Level 2''': '''Wayfinding and universal design''' – At least two shared transport modes
* '''Level 1''': Acceptable walking distance<br>> 2 shared transport modes in acceptable walking distance to public transport and <br>> 1 service (e.g., shop, parcel locker, kiosk) in acceptable walking distance
+
in acceptable walking distance to public transport with wayfinding and information of using the service and at least one service (e.g., parcel locker, kiosk) in acceptable walking distance. Universal design principles are considered.
* '''Level 0''': 1 shared transport mode, not at walking distance to public transport, no integration
+
* '''Level 1''': '''Acceptable walking distance to shared and public transport''' – At least two shared transport modes in acceptable walking distance to public transport and at least one service (e.g., shop, parcel locker, kiosk) in acceptable walking distance. Minimum legal inclusive design requirements are considered.
 +
* '''Level 0''': '''No physical integration''' – One shared transport mode, not at walking distance to public transport, no integration between the modes. No universal design criteria are considered.

Revision as of 17:43, 24 January 2022

  • Level 4: Conflict free and place making – At least two shared transport modes visible from a public transport stop with no conflicts and information of using the services and at least two services. Universal design principles are considered.
  • Level 3: Visibility and branding – At least two shared transport modes visible from a public transport stop and at least one service (e.g., shop, parcel locker, kiosk), information about the service and potential conflicts, attractive design of the mobility hub, branding and aesthetically pleasing scheme. Universal design principles are considered.
  • Level 2: Wayfinding and universal design – At least two shared transport modes

in acceptable walking distance to public transport with wayfinding and information of using the service and at least one service (e.g., parcel locker, kiosk) in acceptable walking distance. Universal design principles are considered.

  • Level 1: Acceptable walking distance to shared and public transport – At least two shared transport modes in acceptable walking distance to public transport and at least one service (e.g., shop, parcel locker, kiosk) in acceptable walking distance. Minimum legal inclusive design requirements are considered.
  • Level 0: No physical integration – One shared transport mode, not at walking distance to public transport, no integration between the modes. No universal design criteria are considered.