From SmartHubs
Revision as of 19:17, 30 November 2021 by Karla Münzel (talk | contribs)
Typology
urban neighbourhood hub - small (two shared modes, <10 vehicles)
Status
planned
Short Description
Public Transport stop next to large market in a challenging neighborhood
USP
redesign square - chance to provide inhabitants of challenging neighbourhood with mobility
Location
SchilderswijkTransvaal
The Hague, Netherlands
Living Lab
Physical Integration
Level 0 (target: Level 3)
Definition 0 (No physical integration): One shared transport mode, not at walking distance to public transport, no integration between the modes. No universal design criteria are considered
modes in vicinity, but no visual hints/info about hub
Digital Integration
Level 0 (target: unknown)
Definition 0 (No digital integration): No digital integration of shared and public transport mode options offered at the hub. There are separate services and platforms for each mode. No universal design criteria are required
HTM Bike is shown in HTM app but is not taken into account in travel advice and cannot be booked. Separate app necessary. Other shared mobility is not integrated in app
Democratic Integration
Level 0
Definition 0 (No involvement): No involvement or consideration of stakeholder interests and user needs.
Neighbourhood Characteristics
Compared to average in city: lower income, slightly younger, higher level of people on social benefits, Very high percentage migrant population (up to 93%). 0,6 cars in household.
Sources
Bicycle sharing programs: a complement or substitute of urban public transport? A case study of a bicycle sharing program in The Hague
van Marsbergen, A. (2020). Bicycle sharing programs: a complement or substitute of urban public transport? A case study of a bicycle sharing program in The Hague. Delft, Delft University of Technology. M.Sc.
Research Projects
Governance
Local Governance